{
 "read": "2026-11-05",
 "about": "AI rules for court filings, each read in the court's own document and quoted from it. Orders change without notice: check the source before relying on an entry.",
 "rules": [
  {
   "id": "fl-2-515",
   "court": "Florida state courts",
   "court_name": "All Florida state courts",
   "title": "Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.515(d)(2)(D), as amended (SC2026-0673)",
   "date": "2026-05-28",
   "date_is": "decided",
   "effective": "2026-06-15",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "Made by signing: the signature itself is the representation.",
   "applies": "Every document filed in a Florida state court.",
   "quote": "(2) Representation by Signer. On filing, each signer represents that: … (D) the legal authorities identified exist and are accurately cited.",
   "source": "https://flcourts-media.flcourts.gov/content/download/2489374/opinion/Opinion_SC2026-0673.pdf",
   "also": {
    "title": "AOSC26-12",
    "source": "https://flcourts-media.flcourts.gov/content/download/2489379/file/AOSC26-12.pdf",
    "quote": "Accordingly, courts may not impose such requirements – whether through local administrative orders, court policies, judicial practices and procedures, or other means."
   },
   "note": "Since 15 June 2026 Florida's circuit courts may not add their own AI disclosure or certification requirements (AOSC26-12), so earlier circuit orders no longer apply.",
   "level": "state",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "ca10-46-5",
   "court": "10th Cir.",
   "court_name": "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit",
   "title": "10th Cir. R. 46.5(B)(4), proposed",
   "date": "2026-09-18",
   "date_is": "published",
   "dates_source": "https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/documents/news/2027PublicRulesMemo.pdf",
   "effective": "2027-01-01",
   "comments_until": "2026-10-18",
   "status": "proposed",
   "requires": [
    "verify"
   ],
   "where": "Made by presenting the paper, as under Rule 11: no separate certificate.",
   "applies": "Every brief, motion or other paper, if adopted.",
   "quote": "(4) any document prepared with the assistance of generative artificial intelligence has been reviewed—before filing or submission to the court—by a human who has independently verified the existence of all cited authorities; the accuracy of all quotations, citations, and legal analysis; and the document’s compliance with all relevant rules and ethical obligations.",
   "source": "https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/documents/news/2027Rules_FullRedline.pdf",
   "level": "appeals",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "ca-ccp-128-7",
   "court": "California state courts",
   "court_name": "All California courts",
   "title": "Code Civ. Proc. § 128.7(b)(2), as amended by SB 574 (Stats. 2026, ch. 858)",
   "date": "2026-09-30",
   "date_is": "approved",
   "effective": "2027-01-01",
   "effective_by": "a statute enacted at the 2026 regular session takes effect on 1 January 2027 (Cal. Const., art. IV, § 8(c)); the act names no other date",
   "status": "enacted",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "verify"
   ],
   "where": "Made by presenting the paper: under § 128.7 it may not contain a citation the responsible attorney has not personally verified, and § 6068.1 asks that the use of generative AI be disclosed to the court. Neither prescribes words.",
   "applies": "Every brief, pleading, motion or other paper filed in any California court, from 1 January 2027.",
   "quote": "(2) (A) A brief, pleading, motion, or any other paper filed in any court shall not contain any citations that an attorney responsible for submitting the pleading has not personally verified, including any citation provided by generative artificial intelligence.",
   "source": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB574",
   "also": {
    "title": "Bus. & Prof. Code § 6068.1(a)(3), added by the same act",
    "source": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB574",
    "quote": "(B) Take reasonable steps to do both of the following: (i) Verify the accuracy of generative artificial intelligence outputs, including, but not limited to, the accuracy of all case and statutory citations. (ii) Correct any erroneous or hallucinated output in any material used by the attorney. (C) Disclose the use of generative artificial intelligence to the court for all documents submitted to the court"
   },
   "note": "The Legislature's site serves the chaptered text to a browser only; it was read in one on 5 November 2026 and the words checked against that reading.",
   "read": "2026-11-05",
   "level": "state",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "ct-pb-4-9",
   "court": "Connecticut Superior Court",
   "court_name": "Connecticut Superior Court, every judicial district",
   "title": "Practice Book § 4-9, Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance (new)",
   "date": "2026-06-11",
   "date_is": "adopted",
   "effective": "2026-06-23",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "verify"
   ],
   "where": "Made by filing: under § 4-9 (c), filing the document is the representation that the rule was followed. No separate statement.",
   "applies": "Any document filed with the court in whose creation or editing generative AI was used.",
   "quote": "(b) Due to the risk that generative AI can create inaccurate factual and legal information, including, without limitation, faulty citations to legal authority, fabricated quotations from such authority, and inaccurate or fabricated evidence, any person who uses generative AI in the creation or editing of any document filed with the court shall independently verify all citations, legal authorities or evidence produced by generative AI. The failure to do so may result in court-imposed sanctions, including, without limitation, the entry of a nonsuit or default judgment. (c) Any person who files documents with the court represents that they have reviewed this rule and, by filing the document, represents that they have made good faith, diligent efforts to ensure compliance with their obligations under this rule, all other rules of practice, the Rules of Professional Conduct, and any applicable provision of Connecticut law regarding the use of or reliance on generative AI.",
   "source": "https://www.jud.ct.gov/legalresources/Docs/LJDocs/Misc/2026/26/pblj_8752.pdf",
   "read": "2026-11-05",
   "level": "state",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "ct-app-62-6",
   "court": "Conn. Sup. & App. Cts.",
   "court_name": "Connecticut Supreme Court and Appellate Court",
   "title": "Rules of Appellate Procedure §§ 62-6 (d) and 85-2 (11), as amended",
   "date": "2026-06-30",
   "date_is": "approved",
   "effective": "2026-07-14",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "Made by signing: the signature certifies that the signer complied with § 4-9 on generative AI. No separate statement.",
   "applies": "Every paper signed and filed in the Supreme Court or the Appellate Court.",
   "quote": "(d) The signing of any paper shall constitute a certificate that the signer has read such document, that to the best of the signer’s knowledge, information and belief there is good ground to support it, that it is not solely interposed for delay, and that the signer has complied with the requirements of Section 4-7 regarding personal identifying information and Section 4-9 regarding generative AI. … (11) Failure to independently verify all citations and legal authorities produced by generative AI in compliance with Sections 4-9 and 62-6 (d).",
   "source": "https://www.jud.ct.gov/LegalResources/Docs/LJDocs/Misc/2026/29/pblj_8803.pdf",
   "read": "2026-11-05",
   "level": "state",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "in-tr-11",
   "court": "Indiana trial courts",
   "court_name": "All Indiana trial courts",
   "title": "Ind. Trial Rule 11(B), as amended (Order 26S-MS-8)",
   "date": "2026-07-14",
   "date_is": "ordered",
   "effective": "2026-08-01",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "Made by signing: an attorney’s signature is the certificate (Rule 11(B)); a self-represented party’s signature certifies the same (Rule 11.1(C)). No separate statement.",
   "applies": "Every pleading, motion or other submission in an Indiana trial court.",
   "quote": "(B) Certification. The signature of an attorney certifies that the … has read the pleadings, motion, or other submission; that to the best of the attorney’s … that any cited legal authority is authentic; and that it is not … delay or harass.",
   "source": "https://www.in.gov/courts/files/order-rules-2026-26S-MS-8.pdf",
   "also": {
    "title": "Trial Rule 11.1(C), for a party not represented by an attorney",
    "source": "https://www.in.gov/courts/files/order-rules-2026-26S-MS-8.pdf",
    "quote": "(C) Certification. The signature certifies that the signer has read the pleading, motion, or other submission; … that any cited legal authority is authentic; and that it is not presented to delay or harass."
   },
   "note": "The order is a redline, so the attorney’s rule is quoted in its new words with the struck ones left out. New Trial Rule 11.2 lets a court find a filer who cites fictitious legal authority an abusive litigant and restrict their filings.",
   "read": "2026-11-05",
   "level": "state",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "ny-part-161",
   "court": "New York state courts",
   "court_name": "New York State Unified Court System",
   "title": "22 NYCRR Part 161 and its Appendix A model rule (AO/75/2026)",
   "effective": "2026-06-01",
   "effective_by": "Administrative Order AO/75/2026 of the Chief Administrative Judge, 25 March 2026, which added Part 161 effective 1 June 2026; the rule’s own page carries no date",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "Made by signing, in a court that has adopted the Appendix A model rule: the signature certifies the review. Part 161 itself asks for no disclosure anywhere; the model rule applies only where a court adopted it as a part rule.",
   "applies": "Any paper prepared with an AI tool and filed in a court that adopted the model rule; the assigned judge’s part rules say whether it did.",
   "quote": "attorneys and parties should not be required, upon submitting papers, to disclose to the court that they have used AI in the preparation of such papers. … any attorney or party who uses an artificial intelligence tool, as defined in 22 NYCRR 161.2(a), in preparing any paper, as defined in 22 NYCRR 161.2(b), filed in or submitted to this court or served on another party in a case before this court is required to carefully review the paper and independently ensure that it contains no fabricated or fictitious cases, statutes, or other material. By signing such paper, an attorney or party certifies that such a review has been conducted and that the paper contains no such fabricated or fictitious content.",
   "source": "https://www.nycourts.gov/rules/part-161-use-artificial-intelligence-technology",
   "note": "The court system’s site serves the rule to a browser only; it was read in one on 5 November 2026 and the words checked against that reading. The order that adopted it, AO/75/2026, was not served at all.",
   "read": "2026-11-05",
   "level": "state",
   "loupe_note": "Part 161 defines AI broadly, as any machine-based system that makes predictions, recommendations or decisions. Loupe does not write or change your document: it reads it, matches each citation against published court records, and reports what it found. Whether using it is using an AI tool under a court’s part rule is for you to judge.",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "txnd-lr-7-2-f",
   "court": "N.D. Tex.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas",
   "title": "Local Civil Rule 7.2(f)",
   "date": "2025-09-02",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose"
   ],
   "where": "On the first page, under the heading “Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence”.",
   "applies": "Every brief, before every judge of the district.",
   "quote": "(1) A brief prepared using generative artificial intelligence must disclose this fact on the first page under the heading “Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence.” If the presiding judge so directs, the party filing the brief must disclose the specific parts prepared using generative artificial intelligence. … (3) A party who files a brief that does not contain the disclosure required by subsection (f)(1) of this rule certifies that no part of the brief was prepared using generative artificial intelligence.",
   "source": "https://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/documents/CIVRULES.pdf",
   "note": "The court's site did not serve this document to us on 26 Sep 2026; the words are as published in the Local Civil Rules effective 1 Sep 2026 and quoted identically by several readers of it.",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence",
    "use": "This brief was prepared using generative artificial intelligence{tool_opt}."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "secondary"
  },
  {
   "id": "ca5",
   "court": "5th Cir.",
   "court_name": "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit",
   "title": "Court Decision on Proposed Rule",
   "status": "no rule",
   "requires": [
    "verify"
   ],
   "applies": "All filings; the court chose not to adopt an AI rule.",
   "quote": "has decided not to adopt a special rule regarding the use of artificial intelligence in drafting briefs at this time. … Parties and counsel are responsible for ensuring that their filings with the court, including briefs, shall be carefully checked for truthfulness and accuracy as the rules already require. “I used AI” will not be an excuse for an otherwise sanctionable offense.",
   "source": "https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/default-source/default-document-library/court-decision-on-proposed-rule.pdf",
   "level": "appeals",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "cacd-blumenfeld",
   "court": "C.D. Cal.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Central District of California",
   "judge": "Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.",
   "title": "Standing Order for Civil Cases",
   "date": "2026-01-14",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "A separate declaration attached to the filing.",
   "applies": "Any brief, pleading or other filing generated in any part with generative AI.",
   "quote": "Any party who uses generative artificial intelligence (such as ChatGPT, Harvey, CoCounsel, or Google Bard) to generate any portion of a brief, pleading, or other filing must attach to the filing a separate declaration disclosing the use of artificial intelligence and certifying that the filer has reviewed the source material and verified that the artificially generated content is accurate and complies with the filer’s Rule 11 obligations.",
   "source": "https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/JpsApi/file/d722706b-9e07-4f2d-d1c5-08de5387c55f",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "DECLARATION REGARDING THE USE OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "I, {signer}, declare:\n\n1. Generative artificial intelligence ({tool}) was used to generate portions of this filing.\n\n2. I have reviewed the source material and verified that the artificially generated content is accurate and complies with my Rule 11 obligations.\n\nI declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on {today}."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "cacd-slaughter",
   "court": "C.D. Cal.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Central District of California",
   "judge": "Judge Fred W. Slaughter",
   "title": "Civil Standing Order",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "A separate declaration attached to the filing.",
   "applies": "Any motion, brief, pleading or other filing generated in any part with generative AI.",
   "quote": "Any party who uses generative artificial intelligence (such as ChatGPT, Harvey, CoCounsel, or Google Bard) to generate any portion of a motion, brief, pleading, or other filing must attach to the filing a separate declaration disclosing the use of artificial intelligence and certifying that the filer has reviewed the source material and verified that the artificially generated content is accurate and complies with the filer’s Rule 11 obligations.",
   "source": "https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/JpsApi/file/26c7e990-34b1-41f3-4d99-08dedec318af",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "DECLARATION REGARDING THE USE OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "I, {signer}, declare:\n\n1. Generative artificial intelligence ({tool}) was used to generate portions of this filing.\n\n2. I have reviewed the source material and verified that the artificially generated content is accurate and complies with my Rule 11 obligations.\n\nI declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on {today}."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "cacd-olguin",
   "court": "C.D. Cal.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Central District of California",
   "judge": "Judge Fernando M. Olguin",
   "title": "Initial Standing Order, § 5",
   "date": "2025-07",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "verify"
   ],
   "where": "Made by submitting the filing; no separate certificate.",
   "applies": "Any filing prepared with an AI tool.",
   "quote": "If any party or attorney uses an artificial intelligence tool in the preparation of any filing, the submission of that document signifies that the individual responsible for the filing has certified that she/he reviewed all source material and verified the accuracy of any AI content.",
   "source": "https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/JpsApi/file/bd1c7516-3cae-41b8-a4da-4ddf08b1e138",
   "level": "federal",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "cand-lee",
   "court": "N.D. Cal.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California",
   "judge": "Judge Eumi K. Lee",
   "title": "Standing Order for Civil Cases, § H",
   "date_is": "updated",
   "date": "2025-08-28",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "certify",
    "signers"
   ],
   "signers": "Lead trial counsel.",
   "where": "In the submission.",
   "applies": "Any submission containing AI-generated content.",
   "quote": "Any submission containing AI-generated content must include a certification that lead trial counsel has personally verified the content’s accuracy. Failure to include this certification or comply with this verification requirement will be grounds for sanctions. Counsel is responsible for maintaining records of all prompts or inquiries submitted to any generative AI tools in the event those records become relevant at any point.",
   "source": "https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/standing-orders/EKL-CivilStandingOrder-8-28-2025.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "CERTIFICATION OF LEAD TRIAL COUNSEL",
    "use": "This submission contains AI-generated content{tool_opt}. I, {signer}, lead trial counsel, certify that I have personally verified the accuracy of that content."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "cand-martinez-olguin",
   "court": "N.D. Cal.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California",
   "judge": "Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín",
   "title": "Standing Order for Civil Cases, “Artificial Intelligence (AI)”",
   "date_is": "revised",
   "date": "2023-11-22",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "certify",
    "signers"
   ],
   "signers": "Lead trial counsel.",
   "where": "In the submission.",
   "applies": "Any submission containing AI-generated content.",
   "quote": "Any submission containing AI-generated content must include a certification that lead trial counsel has personally verified the content’s accuracy. Failure to include this certification or comply with this verification requirement will be grounds for sanctions.",
   "source": "https://cand.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/standing-orders/AMO-Civil-Standing-Order-11.22.2023-FINAL.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "CERTIFICATION OF LEAD TRIAL COUNSEL",
    "use": "This submission contains AI-generated content{tool_opt}. I, {signer}, lead trial counsel, certify that I have personally verified the accuracy of that content."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "cod-wang",
   "court": "D. Colo.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado",
   "judge": "Judge Nina Y. Wang",
   "title": "Standing Order Regarding the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings",
   "date_is": "effective",
   "date": "2025-12-01",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "certify",
    "signers"
   ],
   "signers": "All individuals who contributed to the drafting.",
   "where": "In every filing.",
   "applies": "Every filing, whether or not AI was used.",
   "quote": "Every filing shall contain an AI Certification regarding the use, or non-use, of generative AI (such as ChatGPT, Harvey.AI, or Google Gemini) in preparing the filing, signed by all individuals who contributed to the drafting of the filing. To the extent that generative AI was used in any drafting of the filing, each individual must certify that any language drafted by AI (even if later edited by a human) was personally reviewed by the filer or another human for accuracy and that all legal citations reference actual non-fictitious cases or cited authority.",
   "source": "https://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Portals/0/Documents/Judges/NYW/NYW_Standing_Order_Regarding_AI_Certification.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "AI CERTIFICATION",
    "use": "Generative artificial intelligence ({tool}) was used in drafting this filing. Each of the undersigned certifies that any language drafted by AI (even if later edited by a human) was personally reviewed by the filer or another human for accuracy and that all legal citations reference actual non-fictitious cases or cited authority.",
    "none": "Each of the undersigned certifies that generative artificial intelligence was not used in preparing this filing."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "cod-crews",
   "court": "D. Colo.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado",
   "judge": "Judge S. Kato Crews",
   "title": "Standing Order for Civil Cases",
   "date_is": "revised",
   "date": "2026-01-01",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "In the motion, response or reply.",
   "applies": "Every substantive motion (including under Rules 12, 56 and 65), its response and reply.",
   "quote": "every substantive motion—including, but not necessarily limited to, motions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, 56, and 65—and the corresponding response and reply, shall contain an AI Certification regarding the use, or non-use, of generative AI in preparing the filing. The preparer of the filing must certify either that (1) no portion of the filing was drafted by AI, or that (2) any language drafted by AI (even if later edited by a human) was personally reviewed by the filer or another human for accuracy and all legal citations are to actual, non-fictitious cases or cited authority.",
   "source": "https://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Portals/0/Documents/Judges/SKC/SKC_Standing_Order_Civil_Cases.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "AI CERTIFICATION",
    "use": "The undersigned certifies that any language in this filing drafted by AI (even if later edited by a human) was personally reviewed by the filer or another human for accuracy and all legal citations are to actual, non-fictitious cases or cited authority.",
    "none": "The undersigned certifies that no portion of this filing was drafted by AI."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "cod-prose",
   "court": "D. Colo.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado",
   "judge": "Magistrate Judge Susan Prose",
   "title": "Standing Order Requiring Certification re: Use of AI in Filings",
   "date": "2024-10-21",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "In the motion.",
   "applies": "In consent cases: motions under Rules 12 and 56, motions to amend, and opposed motions, with responses and replies.",
   "quote": "The preparer of the filing must certify either that (a) no portion of the filing was drafted by AI, or that (b) any language drafted by AI (even if later edited by a human being) was personally reviewed by the filer or another human being for accuracy using print reporters or traditional legal databases and attesting that the legal citations are to actual existing cases or cited authority.",
   "source": "https://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Portals/0/Documents/Judges/SP/SP_Standing_Order_AI_Filings.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "CERTIFICATION REGARDING THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "The undersigned certifies that any language in this filing drafted by AI (even if later edited by a human being) was personally reviewed by the filer or another human being for accuracy using print reporters or traditional legal databases, and attests that the legal citations are to actual existing cases or cited authority.",
    "none": "The undersigned certifies that no portion of this filing was drafted by AI."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "gand-johnson",
   "court": "N.D. Ga.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia",
   "judge": "Magistrate Judge Tiffany R. Johnson",
   "title": "Guidelines to Parties and Counsel in Civil Cases, § 3.A",
   "date": "2026-09-01",
   "date_is": "modified",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "tool",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "A signed and filed Disclosure of Use of Artificial Intelligence.",
   "applies": "Any filing or submission prepared with AI in any way.",
   "form": "This document was generated with the assistance of [identify AI tool name]. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that, despite reliance on an AI tool, I have independently reviewed this document to confirm accuracy, legitimacy, and use of good and applicable law, pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.",
   "quote": "If AI was used in any way to prepare a filing or submission to the Court or chambers, counsel and pro se parties are REQUIRED to sign and file a Disclosure of Use of Artificial Intelligence stating, as follows: “This document was generated with the assistance of [identify AI tool name]. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that, despite reliance on an AI tool, I have independently reviewed this document to confirm accuracy, legitimacy, and use of good and applicable law, pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”",
   "source": "https://www.gand.uscourts.gov/sites/gand/files/TRJ_CVStandingOrder.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "DISCLOSURE OF USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "This document was generated with the assistance of {tool}. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that, despite reliance on an AI tool, I have independently reviewed this document to confirm accuracy, legitimacy, and use of good and applicable law, pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure."
   },
   "loupe_note": "This order speaks of AI in general, not only of generative AI. Loupe does not write or change your document: it reads it, matches each citation against published court records, and reports what it found. Whether that has to be disclosed under this order is for you to judge.",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "hid-kobayashi",
   "court": "D. Haw.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii",
   "judge": "Chief Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi",
   "title": "Disclosure and Certification Requirements – Generative AI",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "tool",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "In the document.",
   "applies": "Any document prepared with a generative AI tool.",
   "quote": "must disclose in the document that AI was used and the specific AI tool that was used. The unrepresented party or attorney must further certify in the document that the person has checked the accuracy of any portion of the document drafted by generative AI, including all citations and legal authority.",
   "source": "https://www.hid.uscourts.gov/cms/assets/95f11dcf-7411-42d2-9ac2-92b2424519f6/AI%20Guidelines%20LEK.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "DISCLOSURE AND CERTIFICATION REGARDING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "Generative artificial intelligence was used in preparing this document. The AI tool used was {tool}. The undersigned certifies that the undersigned has checked the accuracy of any portion of this document drafted by generative artificial intelligence, including all citations and legal authority."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "nmd-strickland",
   "court": "D.N.M.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico",
   "judge": "Judge Margaret I. Strickland",
   "title": "Standing Order Establishing Disclosure and Certification Requirements for Generative AI",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "tool",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "In the document.",
   "applies": "Any document prepared with a generative AI tool.",
   "quote": "must disclose in the document that AI was used and the specific AI tool that was used. The unrepresented party or attorney must further certify in the document that the person has checked the accuracy of any portion of the document drafted by generative AI, including all citations and legal authority.",
   "source": "https://www.nmd.uscourts.gov/sites/nmd/files/Standing%20Order%20Regarding%20Use%20of%20Generative%20AI.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "DISCLOSURE AND CERTIFICATION REGARDING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "Generative artificial intelligence was used in preparing this document. The AI tool used was {tool}. The undersigned certifies that the undersigned has checked the accuracy of any portion of this document drafted by generative artificial intelligence, including all citations and legal authority."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "oked-robertson",
   "court": "E.D. Okla.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma",
   "judge": "Magistrate Judge Jason A. Robertson",
   "title": "Disclosure and Certification Requirements for Generative AI",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "tool",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "In the document.",
   "applies": "Any document prepared with a generative AI tool.",
   "quote": "must disclose in the document that AI was used and the specific AI tool that was used. The unrepresented party or attorney must further certify in the document that the person has checked the accuracy of any portion of the document drafted by generative AI, including all citations and legal authority.",
   "source": "https://www.oked.uscourts.gov/sites/oked/files/AI%20Guidelines%20JAR%209.27.23.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "DISCLOSURE AND CERTIFICATION REGARDING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "Generative artificial intelligence was used in preparing this document. The AI tool used was {tool}. The undersigned certifies that the undersigned has checked the accuracy of any portion of this document drafted by generative artificial intelligence, including all citations and legal authority."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "okwd-palk",
   "court": "W.D. Okla.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma",
   "judge": "Judge Scott L. Palk",
   "title": "Disclosure and Certification Requirements – Generative AI",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "tool",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "In the document.",
   "applies": "Any document prepared with a generative AI tool.",
   "quote": "must disclose in the document that AI was used and the specific AI tool that was used. The unrepresented party or attorney must further certify in the document that the person has checked the accuracy of any portion of the document drafted by generative AI, including all citations and legal authority.",
   "source": "https://www.okwd.uscourts.gov/sites/okwd/files/AI_Guidelines_JudgePalk.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "DISCLOSURE AND CERTIFICATION REGARDING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "Generative artificial intelligence was used in preparing this document. The AI tool used was {tool}. The undersigned certifies that the undersigned has checked the accuracy of any portion of this document drafted by generative artificial intelligence, including all citations and legal authority."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "nyed-lindsay",
   "court": "E.D.N.Y.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York",
   "judge": "Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay",
   "title": "Individual Practices, § 3",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "In the document.",
   "applies": "Any document prepared with AI.",
   "quote": "any attorney for a party, or any pro se party, who has used AI in the preparation of any documents filed with the Court must disclose that AI has been used and must further certify in the document that the person has checked the accuracy of any portion of the document drafted by generative AI, including all citations and legal authority.",
   "source": "https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/pub/rules/ARL-MLR.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "DISCLOSURE AND CERTIFICATION REGARDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "AI was used in the preparation of this document{tool_opt}. The undersigned certifies that the undersigned has checked the accuracy of any portion of this document drafted by generative AI, including all citations and legal authority."
   },
   "loupe_note": "This order speaks of AI in general, not only of generative AI. Loupe does not write or change your document: it reads it, matches each citation against published court records, and reports what it found. Whether that has to be disclosed under this order is for you to judge.",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "nysd-broderick",
   "court": "S.D.N.Y.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York",
   "judge": "Judge Vernon S. Broderick",
   "title": "Individual Rules & Practices in Civil Cases, § J",
   "date": "2025-10-29",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "In the document.",
   "applies": "Any document prepared with a generative AI tool; not AI built into Westlaw or Lexis.",
   "quote": "any party, whether appearing pro se or through counsel, who utilizes any generative artificial intelligence (AI) tool in the preparation of any documents filed with the Court must … disclose that AI has been used. If generative AI is utilized in the drafting of any documents filed with the Court, the party must further certify in the document that it has independently reviewed and verified the accuracy of any portion of the document drafted by generative AI, including all citations, quotations, and legal authority, and that the document complies with the filer’s Rule 11 obligations. This rule does not apply to information gathered using AI embedded in legal search engines, such as Westlaw, LexisNexis, etc.",
   "source": "https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/practice_documents/VSB%20Broderick%20Civil%20Rules%20-%20rev%202025.10.29.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "DISCLOSURE AND CERTIFICATION REGARDING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "Generative AI{tool_opt} was used in the preparation of this document. The undersigned certifies that the filer has independently reviewed and verified the accuracy of any portion of this document drafted by generative AI, including all citations, quotations, and legal authority, and that this document complies with the filer’s Rule 11 obligations."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "nysd-cronan",
   "court": "S.D.N.Y.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York",
   "judge": "Judge John P. Cronan",
   "title": "Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases",
   "date_is": "revised",
   "date": "2025-10-23",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "certify",
    "steps"
   ],
   "where": "A signed certification attached to the filing.",
   "applies": "Any filing an AI tool was used to prepare, by every attorney who signs it.",
   "quote": "Any attorney who signs a filing for which an AI tool was used to prepare (including by appearing on the signature block of the filing) must attach to the filing a signed certification (i) stating whether the litigant personally reviewed the filing for accuracy of cited legal authorities and factual assertions and (ii) if so, describing in detail the steps taken to verify the accuracy of all legal authorities and factual assertions generated by the AI tool.",
   "source": "https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/practice_documents/JPC%20Cronan%20Individual%20Civil%20Rules%20-%20Updated%202025.10.23.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "CERTIFICATION REGARDING THE USE OF AN AI TOOL",
    "use": "An AI tool ({tool}) was used to prepare this filing.\n\n(i) {reviewed}\n\n(ii) The steps taken to verify the accuracy of all legal authorities and factual assertions generated by the AI tool: {steps} [Describe how each factual assertion was verified against the record.]"
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "nysd-ho",
   "court": "S.D.N.Y.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York",
   "judge": "Judge Dale E. Ho",
   "title": "Individual Rules and Practices in Criminal Cases, § 1.e",
   "date_is": "revised",
   "date": "2026-01-08",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "A separate declaration attached to the filing.",
   "applies": "Criminal cases: any motion, brief, pleading or other filing generated in any part with generative AI.",
   "quote": "Any party who uses generative artificial intelligence (such as ChatGPT, Harvey, CoCounsel, or Google Bard) to generate any portion of a motion, brief, pleading, or other filing must attach to the filing a separate declaration disclosing the use of artificial intelligence and certifying that the filer has reviewed the source material and verified that the artificially generated content is accurate and complies with the filer’s Rule 11 obligations.",
   "source": "https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/practice_documents/DEH%20Ho%20Individual%20Rules%20and%20Practices%20in%20Criminal%20Cases%20-%20January%202026.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "DECLARATION REGARDING THE USE OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "I, {signer}, declare:\n\n1. Generative artificial intelligence ({tool}) was used to generate portions of this filing.\n\n2. I have reviewed the source material and verified that the artificially generated content is accurate and complies with my Rule 11 obligations.\n\nI declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on {today}."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "paed-baylson",
   "court": "E.D. Pa.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania",
   "judge": "Judge Michael M. Baylson",
   "title": "Standing Order re: Artificial Intelligence",
   "date": "2023-06-06",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "A clear and plain factual statement in the paper.",
   "applies": "Any complaint, answer, motion, brief or other paper prepared with AI in any way.",
   "quote": "MUST, in a clear and plain factual statement, disclose that AI has been used in any way in the preparation of the filing, and CERTIFY, that each and every citation to the law or the record in the paper, has been verified as accurate.",
   "source": "https://www.paed.uscourts.gov/sites/paed/files/documents/procedures/Standing%20Order%20Re%20Artificial%20Intelligence%206.6.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "DISCLOSURE AND CERTIFICATION REGARDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "Artificial intelligence{tool_opt} has been used in the preparation of this filing. The undersigned certifies that each and every citation to the law or the record in this paper has been verified as accurate."
   },
   "loupe_note": "This order speaks of AI in general, not only of generative AI. Loupe does not write or change your document: it reads it, matches each citation against published court records, and reports what it found. Whether that has to be disclosed under this order is for you to judge.",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "paed-scott",
   "court": "E.D. Pa.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania",
   "judge": "Judge Kai N. Scott",
   "title": "Standing Order re: Artificial Intelligence",
   "date": "2025-03-03",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "tool",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "A clear and plain factual statement.",
   "applies": "Any filing in which generative AI was used in citing legal authority.",
   "quote": "then they MUST, in a clear and plain factual statement, disclose that generative AI has been used to assist with the citation of legal authority, disclose what specific generative AI program was used, and CERTIFY that each and every citation of legal authority has been verified as accurate.",
   "source": "https://www.paed.uscourts.gov/sites/paed/files/documents/procedures/scopole.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "DISCLOSURE AND CERTIFICATION REGARDING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "Generative artificial intelligence has been used to assist with the citation of legal authority in this filing. The generative AI program used was {tool}. The undersigned certifies that each and every citation of legal authority has been verified as accurate."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "pamd-latella",
   "court": "M.D. Pa.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania",
   "judge": "Magistrate Judge Leo A. Latella",
   "title": "Practice Order: Use of Generative AI",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "tool",
    "parts",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "A Certificate of Use of Generative AI with the document.",
   "applies": "Any document prepared with a generative AI tool.",
   "quote": "must include with the document a Certificate of Use of Generative AI in which the party must disclose and certify: The specific AI tool that was used; The portions of the filing prepared by the AI program; and That a person has checked the accuracy of any portion of the document generated by AI, including all citations and legal authority.",
   "source": "https://www.pamd.uscourts.gov/content/magistrate-judge-leo-latella",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "CERTIFICATE OF USE OF GENERATIVE AI",
    "use": "The undersigned discloses and certifies:\n\n1. The specific AI tool used: {tool}.\n\n2. The portions of this filing prepared by the AI program: {parts}.\n\n3. A person has checked the accuracy of any portion of this document generated by AI, including all citations and legal authority."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "pamd-mehalchick",
   "court": "M.D. Pa.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania",
   "judge": "Judge Karoline Mehalchick",
   "title": "Practice Order: Use of Generative AI",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "tool",
    "parts",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "A Certificate of Use of Generative AI with the document.",
   "applies": "Any document prepared with a generative AI tool.",
   "quote": "must include with the document a Certificate of Use of Generative AI in which the party must disclose and certify: The specific AI tool that was used; The portions of the filing prepared by the AI program; and That a person has checked the accuracy of any portion of the document generated by AI, including all citations and legal authority.",
   "source": "https://www.pamd.uscourts.gov/content/judge-karoline-mehalchick",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "CERTIFICATE OF USE OF GENERATIVE AI",
    "use": "The undersigned discloses and certifies:\n\n1. The specific AI tool used: {tool}.\n\n2. The portions of this filing prepared by the AI program: {parts}.\n\n3. A person has checked the accuracy of any portion of this document generated by AI, including all citations and legal authority."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "ilnd-cole",
   "court": "N.D. Ill.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois",
   "judge": "Magistrate Judge Jeffrey N. Cole",
   "title": "The Use of “Artificial Intelligence” in the Preparation of Documents Filed Before This Court",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose"
   ],
   "where": "In the filing.",
   "applies": "Any materials prepared with AI, including AI legal research.",
   "quote": "Any party using AI in the preparation of materials submitted to the court must disclose in the filing that an AI tool was used to conduct legal research and/or was used in any way in the preparation of the submitted document.",
   "source": "https://web.archive.org/web/20260626202659/https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_judges/Cole/Artificial%20Intelligence%20Standing%20Order.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "DISCLOSURE OF THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "An AI tool{tool_opt} was used [to conduct legal research / in preparing this document]."
   },
   "loupe_note": "This order speaks of AI in general, not only of generative AI. Loupe does not write or change your document: it reads it, matches each citation against published court records, and reports what it found. Whether that has to be disclosed under this order is for you to judge.",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "dne-7-1-d",
   "court": "D. Neb.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska",
   "title": "NECivR 7.1(d)(4)(B)",
   "date": "2024-12-01",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "In the brief's certificate of compliance, with the word count.",
   "applies": "Every brief.",
   "quote": "(B) Generative Artificial Intelligence. The certificate must state that no generative artificial intelligence program was used in drafting the document, or that to the extent such a program was used, a human signatory of the document verified the accuracy of all generated text, including all citations and legal authority.",
   "source": "https://www.ned.uscourts.gov/internetDocs/localrules/NECivR.2024.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE",
    "use": "This brief complies with the word limit of NECivR 7.1(d). It contains [number] words, as counted by the word-count function of [name and version of the word-processing software], applied to include all text, including the caption, headings, footnotes, and quotations.\n\nA generative artificial intelligence program{tool_opt} was used in drafting this brief. To the extent it was used, a human signatory of this brief verified the accuracy of all generated text, including all citations and legal authority.",
    "none": "This brief complies with the word limit of NECivR 7.1(d). It contains [number] words, as counted by the word-count function of [name and version of the word-processing software], applied to include all text, including the caption, headings, footnotes, and quotations.\n\nNo generative artificial intelligence program was used in drafting this brief."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "ohnd-boyko",
   "court": "N.D. Ohio",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio",
   "judge": "Judge Christopher A. Boyko",
   "title": "Court’s Standing Order on the Use of Generative AI",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "prohibit"
   ],
   "applies": "Every filing; legal and internet search engines excepted.",
   "quote": "no attorney for a party, or a pro se party, may use Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) in the preparation of any filing submitted to the Court. … The Court does not intend this AI ban to apply to information gathered from legal search engines, such as Westlaw or LexisNexis, or Internet search engines, such as Google or Bing.",
   "source": "https://www.ohnd.uscourts.gov/sites/ohnd/files/Boyko.StandingOrder.GenerativeAI.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "loupe_note": "This order speaks of AI in general, not only of generative AI. Loupe does not write or change your document: it reads it, matches each citation against published court records, and reports what it found. Whether that has to be disclosed under this order is for you to judge.",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "ohsd-newman",
   "court": "S.D. Ohio",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio",
   "judge": "Judge Michael J. Newman",
   "title": "Standing Order Governing Civil Cases, AI provision",
   "date_is": "effective",
   "date": "2025-08-27",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "prohibit"
   ],
   "applies": "Every filing; legal and internet search engines, and Word and the like, excepted.",
   "quote": "No attorney for a party, or a pro se party, may use Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) in the preparation of any filing submitted to the Court. … The Court does not intend this AI ban to apply to information gathered from legal search engines, such as Westlaw or LexisNexis, Internet search engines, such as Google or Bing, or Microsoft Suite products or the equivalent, such as Word.",
   "source": "https://www.ohsd.uscourts.gov/sites/ohsd/files//MJN%20Standing%20Civil%20Order%208.27.25.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "loupe_note": "This order speaks of AI in general, not only of generative AI. Loupe does not write or change your document: it reads it, matches each citation against published court records, and reports what it found. Whether that has to be disclosed under this order is for you to judge.",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "cit-kelly",
   "court": "Ct. Int'l Trade",
   "court_name": "U.S. Court of International Trade",
   "judge": "Judge Claire R. Kelly",
   "title": "Order on Artificial Intelligence",
   "date": "2025-07-24",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "tool",
    "parts",
    "secrecy"
   ],
   "where": "A disclosure notice and a certification with the submission.",
   "applies": "Any submission containing text drafted with a generative AI program.",
   "quote": "must be accompanied by: (1) A disclosure notice that identifies the program used and the specific portion of text that have been so drafted; (2) A certification that the use of such program has not resulted in the disclosure of any confidential or business proprietary information to any unauthorized party",
   "source": "https://www.cit.uscourts.gov/sites/cit/files/Order_on_Artificial_Intelligence-Judge_Kelly.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "DISCLOSURE NOTICE AND CERTIFICATION REGARDING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "Disclosure notice. This submission contains text drafted with a generative artificial intelligence program: {tool}. The portions of text so drafted: {parts}.\n\nCertification. The undersigned certifies that the use of this program has not resulted in the disclosure of any confidential or business proprietary information to any unauthorized party."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "cit-vaden",
   "court": "Ct. Int'l Trade",
   "court_name": "U.S. Court of International Trade",
   "judge": "Judge Stephen Alexander Vaden",
   "title": "Order on Artificial Intelligence",
   "date": "2023-06-08",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "tool",
    "parts",
    "secrecy"
   ],
   "where": "A disclosure notice and a certification with the submission.",
   "applies": "Any submission containing text drafted with a generative AI program.",
   "quote": "must be accompanied by: (1) A disclosure notice that identifies the program used and the specific portions of text that have been so drafted; (2) A certification that the use of such program has not resulted in the disclosure of any confidential or business proprietary information to any unauthorized party",
   "source": "https://www.cit.uscourts.gov/sites/cit/files/Order%20on%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "DISCLOSURE NOTICE AND CERTIFICATION REGARDING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "Disclosure notice. This submission contains text drafted with a generative artificial intelligence program: {tool}. The portions of text so drafted: {parts}.\n\nCertification. The undersigned certifies that the use of this program has not resulted in the disclosure of any confidential or business proprietary information to any unauthorized party."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "okwb-go-23-01",
   "court": "Bankr. W.D. Okla.",
   "court_name": "U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma",
   "title": "General Order 23-01",
   "date": "2023-09-01",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "tool",
    "parts",
    "certify",
    "secrecy"
   ],
   "where": "An attestation accompanying the document.",
   "applies": "Any document drafted with a generative AI program.",
   "quote": "must be accompanied by an attestation: (1) identifying the program used and the specific portions of text for which a generative artificial intelligence program was utilized; (2) certifying the document was checked for accuracy using print reporters, traditional legal databases, or other reliable means; and (3) certifying the use of such program has not resulted in the disclosure of any confidential information to any unauthorized party.",
   "source": "https://www.okwb.uscourts.gov/sites/okwb/files/GenOrder23-01.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "says": {
    "heading": "ATTESTATION REGARDING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "1. The generative artificial intelligence program used was {tool}, for these portions of text: {parts}.\n\n2. The undersigned certifies that this document was checked for accuracy using print reporters, traditional legal databases, or other reliable means.\n\n3. The undersigned certifies that the use of this program has not resulted in the disclosure of any confidential information to any unauthorized party."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "ga-fulton-schwall",
   "court": "Fulton Cnty. Super. Ct. (Ga.)",
   "court_name": "Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia",
   "judge": "Judge Craig L. Schwall, Sr.",
   "title": "Standing Order Regarding Use of AI and Certification of Citations",
   "date": "2025-07-11",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "tool",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "At the end of the document, before the signature block.",
   "applies": "All briefs, proposed orders and other submissions prepared, drafted or reviewed with AI in any capacity.",
   "form": "This document was generated with the assistance of [identify AI tool(s) used, e.g., Chat GPT, Perplexity, Claude, etc.]. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that, despite reliance on an AI tool, I have independently reviewed this document to confirm accuracy, legitimacy, and use of good and applicable law. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that every citation to law, case, statute, or the record in this document has been verified as accurate and that it exists as cited and for the proposition cited.",
   "quote": "Any attorney or pro se litigant who uses AI in any capacity to prepare, draft, or review a filing shall disclose such use in the document with the following certification: … The above certification must appear at the end of the document, before the signature block.",
   "source": "https://www.fultonsuperiorcourtga.gov/sites/default/files/judges/forms/schwall-standing_order_re_AI_0.pdf",
   "level": "state",
   "says": {
    "use": "This document was generated with the assistance of {tool}.\n\nI hereby certify under penalty of perjury that, despite reliance on an AI tool, I have independently reviewed this document to confirm accuracy, legitimacy, and use of good and applicable law.\n\nI hereby certify under penalty of perjury that every citation to law, case, statute, or the record in this document has been verified as accurate and that it exists as cited and for the proposition cited."
   },
   "loupe_note": "This order covers AI used in any capacity to prepare, draft, or review a filing. Loupe does not write or change your document: it reads it, matches each citation against published court records, and reports what it found. Whether using it to review has to be disclosed under this order is for you to judge.",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "ks-shawnee-3-125",
   "court": "Shawnee Cnty. Dist. Ct. (Kan.)",
   "court_name": "Third Judicial District of Kansas (Shawnee County)",
   "title": "District Court Rule 3.125",
   "date": "2024-06-14",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "In writing, clearly marked on the first page.",
   "applies": "Any pleading or paper drafted in part with generative AI.",
   "quote": "1) verify that any language, materials or content that was generated was checked for accuracy, using print reporters, traditional legal databases, or other reliable means; and 2) disclose to the Court and opposing parties at the time of filing, in writing and clearly marked on the first page of the document, that it contains AI generated language, materials or content, along with a certification that it was checked for accuracy as required by this rule.",
   "source": "https://www.shawneecourt.org/428/DCR-3125-Pleadings-Using-Generative-Arti",
   "level": "state",
   "says": {
    "heading": "NOTICE OF AI-GENERATED CONTENT",
    "use": "This document contains AI-generated language, materials or content{tool_opt}. The undersigned certifies that it was checked for accuracy, using print reporters, traditional legal databases, or other reliable means, as District Court Rule 3.125 requires."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "mt-4th-3-g",
   "court": "Mont. 4th Jud. Dist.",
   "court_name": "Montana Fourth Judicial District Court (Missoula and Mineral Counties)",
   "title": "Local Rule 3(G)",
   "date": "2025-10-31",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "tool",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "A certification with the pleading or document. Filing without one certifies that no part of it was prepared with generative AI.",
   "date_is": "revised",
   "applies": "Any pleading or document prepared with generative AI.",
   "quote": "must disclose the use of “generative artificial intelligence:” the specific tool the party used; how the party used the tool in preparing the relevant document; and that the party certifies they have checked the accuracy of any portion of the document drafted or assisted by the tool, including all factual and procedural background, citations, and legal authority.",
   "source": "https://courts.mt.gov/external/dcourt/dc_rules/4th.pdf",
   "level": "state",
   "says": {
    "heading": "CERTIFICATION REGARDING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "Generative artificial intelligence was used in the preparation of this document. The specific tool used: {tool}. How it was used: {parts}. The undersigned certifies that the undersigned has checked the accuracy of any portion of this document drafted or assisted by the tool, including all factual and procedural background, citations, and legal authority.",
    "parts_label": "How it was used"
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "il-cook-cleary",
   "court": "Cook Cnty. Cir. Ct. (Ill.)",
   "court_name": "Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division",
   "judge": "Judge Gerald V. Cleary III",
   "title": "Standing Order – Jury Trials, § 1",
   "date": "2024-02-14",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose",
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "In writing on the document.",
   "applies": "Any document, motion, brief or memorandum.",
   "quote": "A party submitting any document, motion, brief or memoranda to the Court must disclose in writing on the submitted document that AI was used in the creation of the document and that the party has verified the existence and accuracy of any authority cited.",
   "source": "https://ocj-web-files.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/orders/2024-02-14%20-%20Law%20-%20Cleary%20-%20Standing%20Order%20-%20Jury%20Trials_1.pdf",
   "level": "state",
   "says": {
    "heading": "DISCLOSURE REGARDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "AI{tool_opt} was used in the creation of this document. The undersigned party has verified the existence and accuracy of any authority cited."
   },
   "loupe_note": "This order speaks of AI in general, not only of generative AI. Loupe does not write or change your document: it reads it, matches each citation against published court records, and reports what it found. Whether that has to be disclosed under this order is for you to judge.",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "il-cook-horan",
   "court": "Cook Cnty. Cir. Ct. (Ill.)",
   "court_name": "Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Calendar 9",
   "judge": "Judge Cecilia A. Horan",
   "title": "Standing Order, General Chancery Calendar 9, § XIII",
   "date_is": "effective",
   "date": "2024-04-05",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "disclose"
   ],
   "where": "In the caption of the motion, brief or other filing.",
   "applies": "Any brief or submission prepared with a large language model.",
   "quote": "Any use of large language model artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT, in the preparation of briefs or other submissions to the Court must be indicated in the caption on the motion, brief or other filing with the Court.",
   "source": "https://ocj-web-files.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/orders/SO%202024%20CH%20Judge%20Horan%20Calendar%209%20Calendar%20Courtroom%20Procedures%20%28Apr.%205%202024%29.pdf",
   "level": "state",
   "says": {
    "use": "PREPARED WITH THE USE OF LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE{tool_opt}"
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "tx-bexar",
   "court": "Bexar Cnty. Civ. Dist. Cts. (Tex.)",
   "court_name": "Civil District Courts of Bexar County, Texas",
   "title": "Local Rules of the Bexar County Civil District Courts",
   "date": "2026-07-01",
   "date_is": "effective",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "A certificate in every pleading.",
   "applies": "All pleadings.",
   "quote": "All pleadings shall include a certificate signed by the attorney or self-represented litigants attesting that all drafted language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments, and legal analyses produced by generative artificial intelligence will before submission, verified by an attorney licensed in Texas or self-represented litigant as legally accurate and that the attorney of record or self-represented litigant understands and acknowledges that they are responsible for their failure to comply with this order.",
   "source": "https://www.bexar.org/DocumentCenter/View/40194/Bexar-County-Civil-District-Courts-Standing-Order-on-AI",
   "level": "state",
   "says": {
    "heading": "CERTIFICATE REGARDING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE",
    "use": "The undersigned attests that all drafted language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments, and legal analyses produced by generative artificial intelligence, if any, were verified before submission, by an attorney licensed in Texas, as legally accurate, and that the undersigned understands and acknowledges responsibility for any failure to comply with the Court’s order.",
    "none": "The undersigned attests that all drafted language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments, and legal analyses produced by generative artificial intelligence, if any, were verified before submission, by an attorney licensed in Texas, as legally accurate, and that the undersigned understands and acknowledges responsibility for any failure to comply with the Court’s order."
   },
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "tx-394th",
   "court": "394th Dist. Ct. (Tex.)",
   "court_name": "394th Judicial District Court of Texas",
   "judge": "Judge Roy B. Ferguson",
   "title": "Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence",
   "date": "2024-08-01",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "The court's form, signed and submitted.",
   "applies": "Anyone who uses AI for research or drafting in a case, before using its output in a submission or proceeding.",
   "quote": "1. all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments, and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative artificial intelligence were before submission verified as accurate through traditional (non-AI) legal sources by a human being, and 2. that the self-represented litigant or attorneys submitting such information understands and acknowledges that they are and will be held responsible and potentially sanctioned for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply with this Order.",
   "source": "https://topics.txcourts.gov/LocalRulesPublic/PreviewAttachment/2018",
   "level": "state",
   "own_form": true,
   "loupe_note": "This order speaks of AI in general, not only of generative AI. Loupe does not write or change your document: it reads it, matches each citation against published court records, and reports what it found. Whether that has to be disclosed under this order is for you to judge.",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "tx-wichita-30th",
   "court": "30th Dist. Ct. (Tex.)",
   "court_name": "30th District Court of Wichita County, Texas",
   "judge": "Judge Jeff McKnight",
   "title": "Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence",
   "date": "2024-03-26",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "certify"
   ],
   "where": "The court's form, attached to each pleading prepared with AI.",
   "applies": "Any pleading generated utilizing AI.",
   "quote": "1. All language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments, and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative artificial intelligence were before submission verified as accurate through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and 2. That the person understands and acknowledges that they are and will be held responsible, and potentially sanctioned, for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply with this Order.",
   "source": "https://topics.txcourts.gov/LocalRulesPublic/PreviewAttachment/1866",
   "level": "state",
   "own_form": true,
   "loupe_note": "This order speaks of AI in general, not only of generative AI. Loupe does not write or change your document: it reads it, matches each citation against published court records, and reports what it found. Whether that has to be disclosed under this order is for you to judge.",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "cand-lin",
   "court": "N.D. Cal.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California",
   "judge": "Judge Rita F. Lin",
   "title": "Standing Order for Civil Cases",
   "date": "2026-03-16",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "verify"
   ],
   "applies": "All filings.",
   "quote": "Use of generative artificial intelligence tools is not prohibited, but counsel must personally confirm for themselves the accuracy of any research conducted by these means, and counsel alone bears ethical responsibility for all statements made in filings.",
   "source": "https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/standing-orders/RFL-CivilStandingOrder_3-16-2026_0.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "cand-thompson",
   "court": "N.D. Cal.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California",
   "judge": "Judge Trina L. Thompson",
   "title": "Standing Order on Civility and Professionalism, § VII",
   "date": "2025-08-18",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "verify"
   ],
   "applies": "All filings.",
   "quote": "Use of ChatGPT or other such AI tools is not prohibited, but counsel must personally confirm for themselves the accuracy of any research conducted by these means, and counsel alone bears ethical responsibility for all statements made in filings.",
   "source": "https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/standing-orders/TLT-Civility-and-Professionalism-Standing-Order.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "alnd-haikala",
   "court": "N.D. Ala.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama",
   "judge": "Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala",
   "title": "Initial Order, § XI",
   "date": "2024-07-08",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "verify"
   ],
   "applies": "All filings.",
   "quote": "The Court does not prohibit the use of AI, but to comply with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and other applicable legal and ethical standards, attorneys and pro se litigants must review and verify computer-generated content to ensure that it is accurate and complies with all such governing standards.",
   "source": "https://www.alnd.uscourts.gov/sites/alnd/files/MHH%20Initial%20Order%20as%20of%207-8-24.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "txs-go-2025-04",
   "court": "S.D. Tex.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas",
   "title": "General Order 2025-04, In re: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence",
   "date": "2025-05-07",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "verify"
   ],
   "applies": "All filings.",
   "quote": "Any attorney or self-represented litigant who signs a pleading, written motion, or other paper submitted to the Court will be held responsible for the contents of that filing under Rule 11, regardless of whether generative artificial intelligence drafted any portion of that filing.",
   "source": "https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/general-orders/General_Order_2025-04_Use_of_Generative_AI_in_Court_Filings.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  },
  {
   "id": "dks-so-26-01",
   "court": "D. Kan.",
   "court_name": "U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas",
   "title": "Standing Order 26-01, Use of Artificial Intelligence in Preparing Court Filings",
   "date": "2026-01-28",
   "status": "in force",
   "requires": [
    "verify"
   ],
   "applies": "All filings.",
   "quote": "Litigants are therefore responsible for reviewing and verifying the accuracy of all content filed with this court that was drafted or assisted by an AI tool.",
   "source": "https://www.ksd.uscourts.gov/sites/ksd/files/Standing%20Order%2026-01%20Use%20of%20AI.pdf",
   "level": "federal",
   "read": "2026-09-26",
   "words": "checked"
  }
 ]
}