loupe.legal

Court rules on AI in filings

Connecticut Supreme Court and Appellate Court.

Rules of Appellate Procedure §§ 62-6 (d) and 85-2 (11), as amended.

In force when read In force since 14 July 2026; read on 5 November 2026.

  • Certify that it was checked

The court’s words

“(d) The signing of any paper shall constitute a certificate that the signer has read such document, that to the best of the signer’s knowledge, information and belief there is good ground to support it, that it is not solely interposed for delay, and that the signer has complied with the requirements of Section 4-7 regarding personal identifying information and Section 4-9 regarding generative AI. … (11) Failure to independently verify all citations and legal authorities produced by generative AI in compliance with Sections 4-9 and 62-6 (d).”

Quoted from the court’s own document, read on 5 November 2026. Read it at the source.

What it asks of the person who signs

  • Certify that it was checked

    in the filing: that the content and the citations were verified.

Applies to: Every paper signed and filed in the Supreme Court or the Appellate Court. Where it goes: Made by signing: the signature certifies that the signer complied with § 4-9 on generative AI. No separate statement.

The statement, if one is called for

Nothing to draft: under this rule, filing the paper is itself the statement.

On the check page Loupe drafts the statement for this court from the parts you tick, for you to read and sign: what it says is your choice and your responsibility. The order in force on the day is what counts; read it at the source before relying on this page.

Check the filing first

Paste the brief or drop the file, and Loupe looks up every citation in the published record: whether the case exists, whether it is the case the filing names, whether the pin cite falls inside the opinion; statutes, regulations, court rules and links too. It doesn’t generate anything, and what it can’t settle it marks “not verified”, never clean.