loupe.legal

What the courts ask you to sign.

AI rules for court filings, each read in the court's own document and quoted from it. Orders change without notice: check the source before relying on an entry.

50 rules and orders, each read in the court’s own document and quoted from it; the list was last built on 5 November 2026, and each entry says when its source was read. Pick a court for its words, what it asks of the signer, and the statement Loupe drafts for it.

Statewide rules

The rules that bind every filing in a state’s courts, newest law first.

CourtRule or orderWhat it asksStanding
All California courts Code Civ. Proc. § 128.7(b)(2), as amended by SB 574 (Stats. 2026, ch. 858) say that generative AI was used; no certificate of its own Enacted; in force from 1 January 2027
All Florida state courts Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.515(d)(2)(D), as amended (SC2026-0673) certify that it was checked In force since 15 June 2026
New York State Unified Court System 22 NYCRR Part 161 and its Appendix A model rule (AO/75/2026) certify that it was checked In force since 1 June 2026
All Indiana trial courts Ind. Trial Rule 11(B), as amended (Order 26S-MS-8) certify that it was checked In force since 1 August 2026
Connecticut Superior Court, every judicial district Practice Book § 4-9, Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance (new) no certificate of its own In force since 23 June 2026
Connecticut Supreme Court and Appellate Court Rules of Appellate Procedure §§ 62-6 (d) and 85-2 (11), as amended certify that it was checked In force since 14 July 2026

Federal courts of appeals

One circuit proposed a rule; one decided against having one.

CourtRule or orderWhat it asksStanding
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 10th Cir. R. 46.5(B)(4), proposed no certificate of its own Proposed; from 1 January 2027 if adopted
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Court Decision on Proposed Rule no certificate of its own No rule adopted

Federal trial courts, judge by judge

Standing orders and local rules, each read in the court’s own document. A judge not listed may have an order Loupe has not read: the court’s site is the place to look.

CourtRule or orderWhat it asksStanding
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas Local Civil Rule 7.2(f) say that generative AI was used In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.
Standing Order for Civil Cases say that generative AI was used; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Judge Fred W. Slaughter
Civil Standing Order say that generative AI was used; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Judge Fernando M. Olguin
Initial Standing Order, § 5 no certificate of its own In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Judge Eumi K. Lee
Standing Order for Civil Cases, § H certify that it was checked; who signs In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín
Standing Order for Civil Cases, “Artificial Intelligence (AI)” certify that it was checked; who signs In force when read
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Judge Nina Y. Wang
Standing Order Regarding the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings say that generative AI was used; certify that it was checked; who signs In force when read
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Judge S. Kato Crews
Standing Order for Civil Cases say that generative AI was used; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Magistrate Judge Susan Prose
Standing Order Requiring Certification re: Use of AI in Filings say that generative AI was used; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Magistrate Judge Tiffany R. Johnson
Guidelines to Parties and Counsel in Civil Cases, § 3.A say that generative AI was used; name the AI tool; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii
Chief Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi
Disclosure and Certification Requirements – Generative AI say that generative AI was used; name the AI tool; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico
Judge Margaret I. Strickland
Standing Order Establishing Disclosure and Certification Requirements for Generative AI say that generative AI was used; name the AI tool; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Magistrate Judge Jason A. Robertson
Disclosure and Certification Requirements for Generative AI say that generative AI was used; name the AI tool; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Judge Scott L. Palk
Disclosure and Certification Requirements – Generative AI say that generative AI was used; name the AI tool; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay
Individual Practices, § 3 say that generative AI was used; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Judge Vernon S. Broderick
Individual Rules & Practices in Civil Cases, § J say that generative AI was used; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Judge John P. Cronan
Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases certify that it was checked; describe the steps taken In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Judge Dale E. Ho
Individual Rules and Practices in Criminal Cases, § 1.e say that generative AI was used; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Judge Michael M. Baylson
Standing Order re: Artificial Intelligence say that generative AI was used; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Judge Kai N. Scott
Standing Order re: Artificial Intelligence say that generative AI was used; name the AI tool; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Magistrate Judge Leo A. Latella
Practice Order: Use of Generative AI say that generative AI was used; name the AI tool; identify what it drafted; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Judge Karoline Mehalchick
Practice Order: Use of Generative AI say that generative AI was used; name the AI tool; identify what it drafted; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Magistrate Judge Jeffrey N. Cole
The Use of “Artificial Intelligence” in the Preparation of Documents Filed Before This Court say that generative AI was used In force when read
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska NECivR 7.1(d)(4)(B) say that generative AI was used; certify that it was checked In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Judge Christopher A. Boyko
Court’s Standing Order on the Use of Generative AI aI may not be used In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Judge Michael J. Newman
Standing Order Governing Civil Cases, AI provision aI may not be used In force when read
U.S. Court of International Trade
Judge Claire R. Kelly
Order on Artificial Intelligence say that generative AI was used; name the AI tool; identify what it drafted; certify that nothing confidential was shared In force when read
U.S. Court of International Trade
Judge Stephen Alexander Vaden
Order on Artificial Intelligence say that generative AI was used; name the AI tool; identify what it drafted; certify that nothing confidential was shared In force when read
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma General Order 23-01 say that generative AI was used; name the AI tool; identify what it drafted; certify that it was checked; certify that nothing confidential was shared In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Judge Rita F. Lin
Standing Order for Civil Cases no certificate of its own In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Judge Trina L. Thompson
Standing Order on Civility and Professionalism, § VII no certificate of its own In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala
Initial Order, § XI no certificate of its own In force when read
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas General Order 2025-04, In re: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence no certificate of its own In force when read
U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas Standing Order 26-01, Use of Artificial Intelligence in Preparing Court Filings no certificate of its own In force when read

State trial courts, judge by judge

Local rules and standing orders in state trial courts.

CourtRule or orderWhat it asksStanding
Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia
Judge Craig L. Schwall, Sr.
Standing Order Regarding Use of AI and Certification of Citations say that generative AI was used; name the AI tool; certify that it was checked In force when read
Third Judicial District of Kansas (Shawnee County) District Court Rule 3.125 say that generative AI was used; certify that it was checked In force when read
Montana Fourth Judicial District Court (Missoula and Mineral Counties) Local Rule 3(G) say that generative AI was used; name the AI tool; certify that it was checked In force when read
Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division
Judge Gerald V. Cleary III
Standing Order – Jury Trials, § 1 say that generative AI was used; certify that it was checked In force when read
Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Calendar 9
Judge Cecilia A. Horan
Standing Order, General Chancery Calendar 9, § XIII say that generative AI was used In force when read
Civil District Courts of Bexar County, Texas Local Rules of the Bexar County Civil District Courts certify that it was checked In force when read
394th Judicial District Court of Texas
Judge Roy B. Ferguson
Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence certify that it was checked In force when read
30th District Court of Wichita County, Texas
Judge Jeff McKnight
Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence certify that it was checked In force when read

Check the filing first

Whatever the court asks, the work is the same: every citation looked up in the published record before the signature. Loupe does that, free and without an account, and drafts the court’s statement from what you tick; it doesn’t generate anything, and what it can’t settle it marks “not verified”, never clean.