loupe.legal

Court rules on AI in filings

Third Judicial District of Kansas (Shawnee County).

District Court Rule 3.125.

In force when read In force when read on 26 September 2026.

  • Say that generative AI was used
  • Certify that it was checked

The court’s words

“1) verify that any language, materials or content that was generated was checked for accuracy, using print reporters, traditional legal databases, or other reliable means; and 2) disclose to the Court and opposing parties at the time of filing, in writing and clearly marked on the first page of the document, that it contains AI generated language, materials or content, along with a certification that it was checked for accuracy as required by this rule.”

Quoted from the court’s own document, read on 26 September 2026. Read it at the source.

What it asks of the person who signs

  • Say that generative AI was used

    or, where the order asks it, that it was not.

  • Certify that it was checked

    in the filing: that the content and the citations were verified.

Applies to: Any pleading or paper drafted in part with generative AI. Where it goes: In writing, clearly marked on the first page.

The statement, if one is called for

The order asks for words of its own. With the blanks filled in from your answers, they read:

NOTICE OF AI-GENERATED CONTENT

This document contains AI-generated language, materials or content [the AI tool, if you name it]. The undersigned certifies that it was checked for accuracy, using print reporters, traditional legal databases, or other reliable means, as District Court Rule 3.125 requires.

On the check page Loupe drafts the statement for this court from the parts you tick, for you to read and sign: what it says is your choice and your responsibility. The order in force on the day is what counts; read it at the source before relying on this page.

Check the filing first

Paste the brief or drop the file, and Loupe looks up every citation in the published record: whether the case exists, whether it is the case the filing names, whether the pin cite falls inside the opinion; statutes, regulations, court rules and links too. It doesn’t generate anything, and what it can’t settle it marks “not verified”, never clean.