loupe.legal

Court rules on AI in filings

U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.

General Order 23-01.

In force when read In force when read on 26 September 2026.

  • Say that generative AI was used
  • Name the AI tool
  • Identify what it drafted
  • Certify that it was checked
  • Certify that nothing confidential was shared

The court’s words

“must be accompanied by an attestation: (1) identifying the program used and the specific portions of text for which a generative artificial intelligence program was utilized; (2) certifying the document was checked for accuracy using print reporters, traditional legal databases, or other reliable means; and (3) certifying the use of such program has not resulted in the disclosure of any confidential information to any unauthorized party.”

Quoted from the court’s own document, read on 26 September 2026. Read it at the source.

What it asks of the person who signs

  • Say that generative AI was used

    or, where the order asks it, that it was not.

  • Name the AI tool

    the order wants the tool identified.

  • Identify what it drafted

    which parts of the filing the tool prepared.

  • Certify that it was checked

    in the filing: that the content and the citations were verified.

  • Certify that nothing confidential was shared

    with the AI tool.

Applies to: Any document drafted with a generative AI program. Where it goes: An attestation accompanying the document.

The statement, if one is called for

The order asks for words of its own. With the blanks filled in from your answers, they read:

ATTESTATION REGARDING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

1. The generative artificial intelligence program used was [name the AI tool], for these portions of text: [identify the portions].

2. The undersigned certifies that this document was checked for accuracy using print reporters, traditional legal databases, or other reliable means.

3. The undersigned certifies that the use of this program has not resulted in the disclosure of any confidential information to any unauthorized party.

On the check page Loupe drafts the statement for this court from the parts you tick, for you to read and sign: what it says is your choice and your responsibility. The order in force on the day is what counts; read it at the source before relying on this page.

Check the filing first

Paste the brief or drop the file, and Loupe looks up every citation in the published record: whether the case exists, whether it is the case the filing names, whether the pin cite falls inside the opinion; statutes, regulations, court rules and links too. It doesn’t generate anything, and what it can’t settle it marks “not verified”, never clean.